CLE SharedEd - Deepfakes Casting Doubt: When Evidence's Authenticity is Questioned Out of Stock

Product Details

The Alaska Bar Association is offering this program to provide additional CLE content for our members. CLE SharedEd programs can be reported as MCLE credits but are not eligible for Alaska Bar discounts or free CLE certificates.  

Deepfakes Casting Doubt: When Evidence's Authenticity is Questioned 

Co-produced by the Center for Integrity in Forensic Sciences and State Bar of Wisconsin PINNACLE

CLE# VOD_2024507

Seeing isn’t always believing

In several recent high-profile cases, including the Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha, defendants have challenged the authenticity of video evidence by arguing that the videos could have been altered by artificial intelligence (AI).¹ The increasing prevalence and sophistication of deepfake media opens the door for litigants to call into question traditionally accepted video and photo evidence. The existence of deepfakes makes it easier for parties to challenge the authenticity of genuine evidence, whether they have a reasonable basis for the challenge or not. Deepfakes also increase the chance that believable but falsified evidence could be relied upon to justify an unjust outcome.

At Deepfakes Casting Doubt: When Evidence’s Authenticity is Questioned, you’ll get an introduction to deepfake technology and hear about real cases where video evidence has been challenged on deepfake grounds. Our highly experienced panel will walk you through the rules of evidence and professional conduct applicable to authenticating evidence in any case where media evidence is challenged. You’ll also pick up best practices for handling challenges to the authenticity.

Enhance your understanding of new and evolving deepfake technology and be prepared to address evidentiary challenges at your next trial with Deepfakes Casting Doubt: When Evidence’s Authority is Questioned.